I mean, why wouldn’t he. In fact, he made your old covenant harder because he taught off the feelings of the heart. But when he died, the old covenant died with it, and when he rose again, he rose to the new covenant in other words a new covenant was was then put in place by his life. He then chose SaulofTaurus. to be his administrator of the new covenant. 99% of churches today preach a mixture of the two. But last there is only one.
The new covenant is the same as the new birth. We are born again by faith in Jesus, death and resurrection. And his new birth means the spirit spirit of God that was lost in Adam,s transgression…very simple
If you don’t mind, I would like you to find, in the Old Testament where the New Covenant is mentioned and who it is made with. The Bible is very explicit on this and it is important for understanding. Hint: You can find the new covenant agreement in the prophets.
Sounds like you’re talking about the prophet Jeremiah… hate to say this if you seem very narcissistic. Another words, disagreeable and prone to argument. Which I do not wish to adore.
I'm actually not here to simply offer my own opinions. Instead, I'd prefer to approach this conversation by asking questions—questions that encourage reflection and exploration. This approach allows for a genuine learning process, one rooted in humility and openness, where an authentic search for truth can truly unfold.
The purpose of these questions is not to challenge for the sake of debate but to invite us both into a deeper examination of what the Bible actually says—not merely what tradition, doctrine, or external voices have told us it says. There is immense value in returning to the text itself, allowing Scripture to speak on its own terms. Only by engaging with the Word directly can we uncover its profound depth and richness.
Take, for instance, the question I previously posed regarding the New Covenant. When we turn to the prophetic writings—specifically Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Ezekiel 36—we see that the covenant is clearly defined as being established with the House of Israel and the House of Judah. This is not a vague or generalized agreement but a very specific, divinely initiated covenant with the people of Israel.
This is important because understanding the intended recipients of the New Covenant reshapes how we view God's faithfulness and unfolding plan throughout history. If we overlook the clear biblical context, we risk misunderstanding the very heart of God's promises and His relationship with His chosen people. Recognizing that the New Covenant is rooted in God's enduring commitment to Israel doesn't exclude others from experiencing its blessings but rather highlights the depth of God's faithfulness to His word and His people.
This realization invites us into a more profound respect for the continuity of Scripture and the integrity of God’s promises. It challenges us to think critically and compassionately about how the ancient covenants intersect with the broader narrative of redemption. And, perhaps most importantly, it reminds us that true understanding begins with sincere inquiry—a willingness to ask, listen, and seek beyond what we may have always assumed to be true.
I look forward to continuing this journey of exploration with you.
Of course, Jesus taught the old covenant…
I mean, why wouldn’t he. In fact, he made your old covenant harder because he taught off the feelings of the heart. But when he died, the old covenant died with it, and when he rose again, he rose to the new covenant in other words a new covenant was was then put in place by his life. He then chose SaulofTaurus. to be his administrator of the new covenant. 99% of churches today preach a mixture of the two. But last there is only one.
I'm curious Herman, who was the New Covenat cut with and what verses support your answer? Thanks!
The new covenant is the same as the new birth. We are born again by faith in Jesus, death and resurrection. And his new birth means the spirit spirit of God that was lost in Adam,s transgression…very simple
If you don’t mind, I would like you to find, in the Old Testament where the New Covenant is mentioned and who it is made with. The Bible is very explicit on this and it is important for understanding. Hint: You can find the new covenant agreement in the prophets.
Sounds like you’re talking about the prophet Jeremiah… hate to say this if you seem very narcissistic. Another words, disagreeable and prone to argument. Which I do not wish to adore.
I'm actually not here to simply offer my own opinions. Instead, I'd prefer to approach this conversation by asking questions—questions that encourage reflection and exploration. This approach allows for a genuine learning process, one rooted in humility and openness, where an authentic search for truth can truly unfold.
The purpose of these questions is not to challenge for the sake of debate but to invite us both into a deeper examination of what the Bible actually says—not merely what tradition, doctrine, or external voices have told us it says. There is immense value in returning to the text itself, allowing Scripture to speak on its own terms. Only by engaging with the Word directly can we uncover its profound depth and richness.
Take, for instance, the question I previously posed regarding the New Covenant. When we turn to the prophetic writings—specifically Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Ezekiel 36—we see that the covenant is clearly defined as being established with the House of Israel and the House of Judah. This is not a vague or generalized agreement but a very specific, divinely initiated covenant with the people of Israel.
This is important because understanding the intended recipients of the New Covenant reshapes how we view God's faithfulness and unfolding plan throughout history. If we overlook the clear biblical context, we risk misunderstanding the very heart of God's promises and His relationship with His chosen people. Recognizing that the New Covenant is rooted in God's enduring commitment to Israel doesn't exclude others from experiencing its blessings but rather highlights the depth of God's faithfulness to His word and His people.
This realization invites us into a more profound respect for the continuity of Scripture and the integrity of God’s promises. It challenges us to think critically and compassionately about how the ancient covenants intersect with the broader narrative of redemption. And, perhaps most importantly, it reminds us that true understanding begins with sincere inquiry—a willingness to ask, listen, and seek beyond what we may have always assumed to be true.
I look forward to continuing this journey of exploration with you.
Not a chance… your original post was childish at best… argumentative for the sake of arguments…. No redeeming value.
Paul was a member of the Sanhedrin. Most certainly he followed it.